Trigger
A weekly review confirms a change to a customer interface dimension. A mechanical engineer submits the change intent and specifies the equipment serial number from which it must take effect.
SCENARIO-DETAIL / LOCALIZED DECISION BRIEF
Engineering Request to PLM Change Release
Business trigger: A weekly review confirms a change to a customer interface dimension. A mechanical engineer submits the change intent and specifies the equipment serial number from which it must take effect.
REFERENCE_ARCHITECTURE · READBACK_VERIFY
SCENARIO COORDINATE / STEP 02
Decide whether this reference scenario belongs in comparison.
Confirm source, Truth and maximum action boundary before moving it into a fixed-field comparison.
- Scenario ID
- C.01
- Source
- pp.6–7
- Truth
- REFERENCE_ARCHITECTURE
- Action boundary
- READBACK_VERIFY
Current taskEngineering Request to PLM Change Release
Review the reference architecture only. This page does not connect systems, execute actions or present a candidate as deployed.
Next stepCompare C.01 with another change loop, then confirm the version Owner, human gates and readback systems.
Only the current scenario ID enters the comparison view; no direction is saved and no pilot is submitted automatically.
REFERENCE_ARCHITECTURE · READBACK_VERIFY · REFERENCE SUPPORT ONLY · NO PRODUCTION CONNECTION · NO CUSTOMER EFFECT CLAIM
DECISION RECORD / C.01
What this route helps you decide
Source-traceable reference · pp.6–7
Goal
Turn the meeting decision into a governed engineering change while keeping BOM, purchasing, work orders, inspection and shop-floor documents on the same version.
Risk / exception
If any system carries a conflicting version, a write times out, or an old work order remains executable, keep the task in NEEDS_REVIEW and do not declare completion. Create an accountable Owner, SLA and compensating action.
Close condition
The new PLM version is released; ERP/MES/QMS readback agrees; disposition of the old version is recorded; approvals, action IDs, file hashes and acknowledgement receipts are complete.
Next safe action
Compare C.01 with another change loop, then confirm the version Owner, human gates and readback systems.
KNOWLEDGE → COMPARISON → DIRECTION → OPTIMIZATION
Evidence stays attached to the decision.
The full-detail canonical evidence record remains available in Chinese. IDs, Truth classes, boundaries, and source references stay unchanged across languages.
Knowledge
Source-traceable reference
Comparison
Compare the same operating fields before choosing a direction.
Direction
Confirm the owner, authority, human gate, and readback rule.
Optimization
Define a baseline, target, owner, and observation window before claiming impact.